The Devil and Dr. Graham

The Devil and Dr. Graham…and Us

This isn’t about Billy Graham, whose consistency of character and integrity of life are worthy of the honor he is receiving. It’s about Franklin, who inherited his father’s organization without learning the lessons his father learned along the way.

But it’s not only about Franklin. It’s about Franklin as the representative of the “evangelical” movement in America.  That’s the branch of the Christian family tree on which I grew up, began following Christ and found my calling.  Recently, however, “evangelical” has become the label for a political movement that is unfailingly loyal to a President whose personal behavior and political leadership are a consistent contradiction of many of the things my evangelical forebears taught me.

But it’s not about politics.  It’s about rescuing the Christian faith from the biblically shallow and theologically bankrupt version of it that is being promoted by Franklin and some other evangelical leaders today.  The gospel deserves better than this because it is better than this.

In the end, it’s about all of us who are called during Lent to follow Jesus into the wilderness where we come face-to-face with the devil and wrestle with the power of temptation. (Matthew 4:1-11)

Into the Wilderness

In Easter Earthquake I described the wilderness as:  Satan-Tempts-Jesus-GettyImages-463967715-5808f7b65f9b58564c318113

“…the soul-searching place where we face the temptation to settle for things that are less than God’s best, to take a shortcut to get to Easter without going through Lent, to experience new life without going to the cross.”   

The temptations are all about power.  Jesus is tempted to use God’s power to satisfy his own human desires, to attract attention to himself, and to take control of “all the kingdoms of this world.”  The temptations are also about means and ends. Will Jesus use the devil’s means to attempt to accomplish a divine end?

Jesus won that wrestling match in the wilderness.  Unfortunately, my observation is that Franklin and his followers have taken the devil’s bait and have fallen into his age-old trap.

What’s the Agenda?  

This came into focus for me in a New York Times editorial  by David Brody, a Christian Broadcasting Network commentator and author of  The Faith of Donald J. Trump. Brody acknowledged the President’s moral failures, but offered a measure of grace that conservative Christians never offered to prior Presidents.  He wrote, “They afford him grace when he doesn’t deserve it…But evangelicals truly do believe that all people are flawed, and yet Christ offers them grace. Shouldn’t they do the same for the president?”

Nothing essentially wrong with that word of grace.  We all stand in need of the forgiveness and grace we don’t deserve.

But Brody heads off into the wilderness when he explains why these evangelicals offer such expansive grace to this uniquely flawed leader.

It’s because “they’re looking for a bold culture warrior to fight for them.”  He asks, “Why in the world wouldn’t evangelicals get behind and support a man who not only is in line with most of their agenda but also has delivered time and time again?”

And here’s Brody’s definition of the evangelical agenda:

The goal of evangelicals has always been winning the larger battle over control of the culture, not to get mired in the moral failings of each and every candidate.”  

I reject Brody’s use of the word “always” because “control of the culture” was not the agenda of the evangelicals who nurtured my faith nor of Billy Graham, whose evangelistic crusades were focused (some would say too narrowly focused) on personal faith in Christ.  

Peter Storey, 326d41de12ed4bc1b3037503052b7a0awho led the Methodists in South Africa during the struggle against Apartheid, reflected on this question in remembering his personal encounter with Billy Graham. “His mandate, he claimed, was to preach the ‘plain and simple Gospel.’ The problem is there is no such thing. What he really meant was that he would offer only half the Gospel, the half that invited people to face their personal sins without confronting the systems that often did their sinning for them.”

In contrast to Billy Graham, Brody said the goal is control of the cultural, i.e. political power focused on a narrow set of social issues. To achieve that goal, the end justifies any means, including accepting or denying the moral failures of their “cultural warrior.”

Hard Questions in the Wilderness 

All of which raises some disturbing questions about this version Christianity; questions with which every faithful disciple is called to wrestle in the wilderness.

  • Is the agenda we seek a tangible expression of the agenda that Jesus described as the Kingdom of God? (Luke 4:16-30)?
  • Is “control of the culture” through political power consistent with the Sermon on the Mount?
  • Do the means we use to achieve our goals demonstrate the way Jesus said God’s Kingdom comes in this world? (Matthew 13)
  • How does Jesus’ call to discipleship fit into this “cultural warrior” agenda?  (Luke 9:23-27)
  • 380274If Jesus had been willing to strike a political bargain with Pilate, would he have ended up on a Roman cross?  (John 18:28-40)
  • What will it mean for us to live into “the foolishness of the cross”?  (1 Corinthians 1:18-31)

These are not easy questions with simplistic answers.  They can’t be answered with a political slogan or a Tweet.  The wilderness is never a comfortable place; neither is the cross.  But the wilderness is where we decide who we are and what God is calling us to be or do.  The cross is where we see the means by which God intends to answer the prayer that God’s kingdom will come and God’s will be done on earth as it is in heaven.

Wrestling in the wilderness,

Jim Harnish

Categories Uncategorized

11 thoughts on “The Devil and Dr. Graham

  1. Good one!

    Mark P. Buell
    Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers
    Board Certified by the Florida Bar in Civil Trial Law and Business Litigation Law
    Board Certified by the National Board of Trial Advocacy as a Civil Trial Lawyer

    Buell & Elligett, P.A.
    3003 W. Azeele Street, Suite 100
    Tampa, Florida 33609
    Telephone: (813) 874-2600
    Facsimile: (813) 874-1760

    This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.

    Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.

  2. Thank you for stating so specifically and eloquently what C&I have discussed; I tend to cast BG more positively than C, but FG is a false prophet to both of us. I’ll send your piece on to Charley; it s helpful. Lfw

    Sent from my iPad


  3. Stephen Bauman2 March 5, 2018 — 3:47 pm

    well said jim & peter too!!


  4. Thanks for doing your homework and providing a path for the rest of us to think and do. I have always felt a tension between personal salvation and social justice. It appears to me that if we receive a call it not only changes our life and goals, but calls us into the fray of helping God restore life for the least among us. That is a culture shift, and requires some confrontation of those who seek a culture that makes them feel secure within a small concept of the world while providing handsome political and financial rewards considered “Gods blessings”. It is easy to oversimplify the calling we have.
    Peace, and thanks,

  5. susankaugustine March 5, 2018 — 6:33 pm

    Well said, Cousin. Your question, “Is ‘control of the culture’ through political power consistent with the Sermon on the Mount?” resonates. Blessed are the meek.
    Thanks for this. Love, Sue

    1. Thanks! It’s no surprise that we don’t hear much about the Sermon on the Mount from these folks. In fact, they hardly ever mention Jesus.

  6. Jim, this post is truly outstanding. May I have your permission to republish it on United Methodist Insight?

  7. Lucretia Murphy March 6, 2018 — 12:50 am

    Challenging, but just the right questions for Christians to be answering.


  8. Thank you, Jim. Well said. Lots to study on.

  9. Thanks Jim. Speaking truth to power is the only way to get Jesus and His teachings back into the heart of the pompous Christian right. They have caved, sold out, ignored the realities of following in our namesake’s footsteps. In this season of fake news and segregated news sources, lies propping up Satan are proving much more appealing. I agree with your learned assessment. We must hold our government in constant prayer. Could the OT prophets be speaking to us?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close